Research, peer-reviewed and openly published.
Working papers and full-length research from our Assessment Science team. Predictive validity, adverse impact, schools engagement effectiveness, AI-on-both-sides. All benchmarked on our 2.4M-application dataset, all openly published with full methodology. No NDA, no gate, no email harvesting.
Loading…
Open methodology, peer-reviewed, no NDA.
The research above is openly published, fully methodologically transparent, and peer-reviewed by an external panel of five chartered business psychologists before release. You don’t need an NDA, an account, or a commercial relationship to read or cite anything we put out, and if it’s on this page, it’s public.
If we’ve published a number, we’ve already had it checked.
Procurement teams writing social-value bids, journalists fact-checking a quote, in-house researchers replicating our methodology, students writing dissertations: take what you need. Attribution is appreciated, not required.
If you spot a methodological gap, an analytical error, or a place where the data doesn’t support the conclusion, we’d like to know: [email protected].